1 | % (c) 2014-2019 Lehrstuhl fuer Softwaretechnik und Programmiersprachen, | |
2 | % Heinrich Heine Universitaet Duesseldorf | |
3 | % This software is licenced under EPL 1.0 (http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-v10.html) | |
4 | ||
5 | :- module(ltl_fairness,[initialise_fairness_assumptions/4, | |
6 | fairness_check_on/2, | |
7 | ev_fairness_id/3, | |
8 | ev_fairness_id/4, | |
9 | get_fairness_specification/3]). | |
10 | ||
11 | :- use_module(probsrc(module_information)). | |
12 | :- module_info(group,ltl). | |
13 | :- module_info(description,'This module provides LTL fairness checking on models.'). | |
14 | ||
15 | % SICSTUS libraries | |
16 | :- use_module(library(lists)). | |
17 | :- use_module(library(ordsets)). | |
18 | :- use_module(library(codesio)). % for read_from_codes/2 | |
19 | ||
20 | % ProB libraries | |
21 | :- use_module(probsrc(specfile),[animation_mode/1,csp_mode/0,b_mode/0]). | |
22 | :- use_module(probsrc(self_check)). | |
23 | :- use_module(probsrc(error_manager)). | |
24 | :- use_module(probsrc(debug)). | |
25 | :- use_module(probsrc(state_space),[transition/4]). | |
26 | ||
27 | :- use_module(probltlsrc(ltl_tools), [preprocess_tp/2]). | |
28 | :- use_module(probltlsrc(ltl_propositions), [check_transition/4]). | |
29 | ||
30 | % import the low-level C-library wrapper | |
31 | :- use_module(extension('ltlc/ltlc')). | |
32 | ||
33 | % We allow that more than one action can be given in a single LTL formula | |
34 | % for checking the found SCC component for fairness in regard to those actions. | |
35 | % There are two types of fairness which we want to support for the LTL Model Checker: strong and weak fairness. | |
36 | ||
37 | % We use the operators SF(-) and WF(-) for picking actions for the fairness assumption. If we want to check | |
38 | % an LTL formula "f" by setting strong fairness constraints for the action a, we write then "SF(a) => f". | |
39 | % It is also possible to express fairness constraints for more than one actions by using the boolean operators | |
40 | % & and or. | |
41 | ||
42 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | |
43 | ||
44 | ||
45 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Initialising the fairness assumptions (begin) %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | |
46 | % temporary implemented prediates for testing the fairness check implementation. | |
47 | ||
48 | % if you want to check if a trace is strongly fair w.r.t. multiple actions (e.g. Req2 and Req1) | |
49 | % then conjugate these with the & operator and place every action between two braces | |
50 | ||
51 | % in case fairness should be ignored, just give an empty atom ''. | |
52 | ||
53 | fairness_check_on(all,_StrongFairnessAssumption). | |
54 | fairness_check_on([_|_],_StrongFairnessAssumption). | |
55 | fairness_check_on(_WeakFairnessAssumption,all). | |
56 | fairness_check_on(_WeakFairnessAssumption,[_|_]). | |
57 | ||
58 | initialise_fairness_assumptions(Ltl,WeakFairnessArgs,StrongFairnessArgs,LtlFormula) :- | |
59 | (Ltl = fairnessimplication(FairnessFormula,LtlFormula) -> | |
60 | get_strong_weak_fairness_arguments(FairnessFormula,WeakFairnessArgs,StrongFairnessArgs), | |
61 | debug_println(9,get_strong_weak_fairness_arguments(FairnessFormula,WeakFairnessArgs,StrongFairnessArgs)) | |
62 | ; otherwise -> | |
63 | WeakFairnessArgs = [], StrongFairnessArgs = [], LtlFormula = Ltl). | |
64 | ||
65 | get_strong_weak_fairness_arguments(FairnessFormula,WeakFairnessArgs,StrongFairnessArgs) :- | |
66 | (FairnessFormula = and(strongassumptions(SAssumptions),weakassumptions(WAssumptions)) | |
67 | -> get_fairness_assumption_actions(SAssumptions,StrongFairnessArgs), | |
68 | get_fairness_assumption_actions(WAssumptions,WeakFairnessArgs) | |
69 | ; FairnessFormula = and(weakassumptions(WAssumptions),strongassumptions(SAssumptions)) | |
70 | -> get_fairness_assumption_actions(SAssumptions,StrongFairnessArgs), | |
71 | get_fairness_assumption_actions(WAssumptions,WeakFairnessArgs) | |
72 | ; FairnessFormula = weakassumptions(F) | |
73 | -> StrongFairnessArgs =[], get_fairness_assumption_actions(F,WeakFairnessArgs) | |
74 | ; FairnessFormula = strongassumptions(F) | |
75 | -> WeakFairnessArgs = [], get_fairness_assumption_actions(F,StrongFairnessArgs) | |
76 | ; otherwise | |
77 | -> add_internal_error('Unrecognised fairness assumption: ', get_strong_weak_fairness_arguments(FairnessFormula,WeakFairnessArgs,StrongFairnessArgs)) | |
78 | ). | |
79 | ||
80 | get_fairness_assumption_actions(F,Res) :- | |
81 | (F=all -> | |
82 | Res = all | |
83 | ; otherwise -> | |
84 | normalise_to_dnf(F,DNF), | |
85 | (debug:debug_mode(on) -> | |
86 | ltl_translate: pp_ltl_formula(DNF,Text), | |
87 | print('Disjunctive Normal Form for Fairness Forlmula: '), | |
88 | print(Text),nl | |
89 | ; true), | |
90 | get_or_args(DNF,R), | |
91 | list_to_ord_set(R,Res) | |
92 | ). | |
93 | ||
94 | :- assert_must_succeed((normalise_to_dnf(and(or(ap(a),ap(b)),ap(c)),R), R == or(and(ap(a),ap(c)),and(ap(b),ap(c))))). | |
95 | :- assert_must_succeed((normalise_to_dnf(and(ap(a),ap(b)),R), R == and(ap(a),ap(b)))). | |
96 | :- assert_must_succeed((normalise_to_dnf(or(ap(a),ap(b)),R), R == or(ap(a),ap(b)))). | |
97 | :- assert_must_succeed((normalise_to_dnf(ap(a),R), R == ap(a))). | |
98 | :- assert_must_succeed((normalise_to_dnf(and(or(ap(a),ap(b)),or(ap(c),ap(d))),R), | |
99 | R == or(or(and(ap(a),ap(c)),and(ap(a),ap(d))),or(and(ap(b),ap(c)),and(ap(b),ap(d)))) )). | |
100 | ||
101 | normalise_to_dnf(F,DNF) :- | |
102 | ex2disj(F,DNF). | |
103 | ||
104 | ex2disj(or(A,B),or(AR,BR)) :- !, | |
105 | ex2disj(A,AR), | |
106 | ex2disj(B,BR). | |
107 | ex2disj(and(A,B),R) :- !, | |
108 | ex2disj(A,AR), | |
109 | ex2disj(B,BR), | |
110 | join(AR,BR,R). | |
111 | ex2disj(ap(X),ap(X)) :- !. | |
112 | ||
113 | join(or(A,B),C,or(AC,BC)) :- !, | |
114 | join(A,C,AC), | |
115 | join(B,C,BC). | |
116 | join(C,or(A,B),or(AC,BC)) :- | |
117 | C\=or(_,_),!, | |
118 | join(C,A,AC), | |
119 | join(C,B,BC). | |
120 | join(A,B,and(A,B)) :- | |
121 | A\=or(_,_),B\=or(_,_),!. | |
122 | ||
123 | % left argument of get_and_args/2 is a boolean formula in DNF without any not(-) operators | |
124 | get_or_args(ap(strong_fair(A)),[[R]]) :- !, | |
125 | preprocess_tp(A,R). | |
126 | get_or_args(ap(weak_fair(A)),[[R]]) :- !, | |
127 | preprocess_tp(A,R). | |
128 | %get_or_args(ap(A),[[A]]) :- atom(A),!. | |
129 | get_or_args(and(A,B),Args) :- !, | |
130 | get_and_args(and(A,B),Res), | |
131 | list_to_ord_set(Res,Res1), | |
132 | Args = [Res1]. | |
133 | get_or_args(or(A,B),Res) :- !, | |
134 | get_or_args(A,R1), | |
135 | get_or_args(B,R2), | |
136 | append(R1,R2,Res). | |
137 | ||
138 | get_and_args(ap(strong_fair(A)),[R]) :- !, preprocess_tp(A,R). | |
139 | get_and_args(ap(weak_fair(A)),[R]) :- !, preprocess_tp(A,R). | |
140 | %get_and_args(ap(A),[A]) :- atom(A),!. | |
141 | get_and_args(and(A,B),Res) :- !, | |
142 | get_and_args(A,R1), | |
143 | get_and_args(B,R2), | |
144 | append(R1,R2,Res). | |
145 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Initialising the fairness assumptions (end) %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | |
146 | ||
147 | ||
148 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Callback predicates (begin) %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | |
149 | % Callback from LTLc (fairness): | |
150 | ||
151 | % check_fairness(FairnessAssumption,[anode(AtomId,Nodeid,[trans(NextAtomId,NextNodeId,[TransitionId])])]) | |
152 | % FairnessAssumtion is the Fairness Condition of the LTL formula. | |
153 | % For instance, if we have the LTL formula "SF ([a] & [b]) => Phi" then FairnessAssumption consists of the actions [a,b] | |
154 | ||
155 | % Tested only for B and CSP models | |
156 | %% :- use_module(library(timeout)). | |
157 | ||
158 | %get_transition_ids(Arg,StateIds,LTransIds) :- %trace, | |
159 | % time_out(get_transition_ids_1(Arg,StateIds,LTransIds1),5000,R), | |
160 | % (R = time_out -> LTransIds = []; LTransIds = LTransIds1). | |
161 | ||
162 | :- public cltl_get_transition_ids_callback/3. | |
163 | %%% infolog-analysis: call-back predicate from C | |
164 | cltl_get_transition_ids_callback(Arg,StateIds,LTransIds) :- | |
165 | (var(Arg) -> | |
166 | add_internal_error('Action argument is a variable!',cltl_get_transition_ids_callback(Arg,StateIds,LTransIds)) | |
167 | ; var(StateIds) -> | |
168 | % if StateIds is a variable it can cause endless loop (memory use increases rapidly) | |
169 | add_internal_error('Unexpected argument for state ids. Expected a list of state ids, but got a variable!',cltl_get_transition_ids_callback(Arg,StateIds,LTransIds)) | |
170 | ; otherwise -> | |
171 | get_transition_ids(Arg,StateIds,LTransIds), | |
172 | length(StateIds,NStates),length(LTransIds,NTransitions), | |
173 | debug_println(9,get_transition_ids(fainress_argument(Arg),state_ids(NStates,StateIds),transition_ids(NTransitions,LTransIds))) | |
174 | ). | |
175 | ||
176 | get_transition_ids(Arg,StateIds,LTransIds) :- | |
177 | findall(TransId,(member(NodeId,StateIds),match_transition(NodeId,Arg,TransId)),LTransIds). | |
178 | ||
179 | match_transition(NodeId,Arg,TransId) :- | |
180 | %% print(match_transition(NodeId,Arg,TransId)),nl, | |
181 | transition(NodeId,OpName,TransId,Dst), | |
182 | match_transition_with_argument(Arg,OpName,NodeId,Dst). | |
183 | %% check_transition(Arg,OpName,NodeId,_Dst). | |
184 | ||
185 | match_transition_with_argument(bop(Name,NumberArgs,NumberResults,ArgPatterns,ResPatterns),Transition,_NodeId,_Dst) :- !, | |
186 | functor(Op,Name,NumberArgs), | |
187 | ( NumberResults == 0 -> | |
188 | Transition = Op | |
189 | ; otherwise -> | |
190 | Transition = '-->'(Op,ReturnValues), | |
191 | length(ReturnValues,NumberResults), | |
192 | (ReturnValues=ResPatterns -> true | |
193 | ; ltl_propositions: check_bop_res_patterns(ResPatterns,SrcNode,State,ReturnValues)) | |
194 | ), | |
195 | (Op =.. [_Name|ArgPatterns]; ltl_propositions: check_bop_arg_patterns(ArgPatterns,SrcNode,State,Op)). | |
196 | match_transition_with_argument(Op,Transition,NodeId,DstId) :- | |
197 | check_transition(Op,Transition,NodeId,DstId). | |
198 | ||
199 | :- public cltl_get_enabled_actions_callback/2. | |
200 | % In case we have general fairness checking for all actions of the model | |
201 | %%% infolog-analysis: call-back predicate from C | |
202 | cltl_get_enabled_actions_callback(StateIds,ActionsSet) :- | |
203 | % is it possible to get an empty list? | |
204 | findall(Action,(member(StateId,StateIds),get_enabled_action(StateId,Action)),Actions), | |
205 | list_to_ord_set(Actions,ActionsSet), | |
206 | debug_println(9,enabled_actions(StateIds,ActionsSet)). | |
207 | ||
208 | get_enabled_action(StateId,Action):- | |
209 | transition(StateId,A,_AId,_DstId), | |
210 | create_action_argument(A,Action). | |
211 | ||
212 | create_action_argument(A,Action) :- | |
213 | animation_mode(Mode), | |
214 | (Mode == cspm -> | |
215 | get_tp_specification_for_csp(A,Action) | |
216 | ; Mode == b -> | |
217 | get_tp_specification_for_b(A,Action) | |
218 | ; Mode == csp_and_b -> | |
219 | get_tp_specification_for_csp_and_b(A,Action) | |
220 | ; Mode == xtl -> %TO DO: review wether ok | |
221 | create_xtl_action_argument(A,Action) | |
222 | ; otherwise -> % TODO: implement general fairness check support also for the other formalisms | |
223 | animation_mode(Mode), | |
224 | add_error(ltl_wrap_action,'Fairness not supported for ',action(A,Mode)) | |
225 | ). | |
226 | ||
227 | create_xtl_action_argument(Op,xtl(OpName,Arity,Args)) :- | |
228 | functor(Op,OpName,Arity), Op =.. [_|Args]. | |
229 | ||
230 | get_tp_specification_for_csp_and_b(A,Action) :- | |
231 | % plain CSP event | |
232 | functor(A,F,_), | |
233 | member(F,[tau,io]),!, | |
234 | get_tp_specification_for_csp(A,Action). | |
235 | get_tp_specification_for_csp_and_b(A,Action) :- | |
236 | get_tp_specification_for_b(A,Action). | |
237 | ||
238 | :- public get_transition_id/4. % used by C Callback ?? | |
239 | get_transition_id(Arg,NodeId,TransId,DstId) :- %trace, | |
240 | transition(NodeId,Op,TransId,DstId), | |
241 | match_transition_with_argument(Arg,Op,NodeId,DstId). | |
242 | % %% check_transition(Arg,Op,NodeId,DstId). | |
243 | ||
244 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Callback predicates (end) %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | |
245 | ||
246 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Predicates for checking whether the given SCC is a possible counter example for a checked Ltl formula %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | |
247 | ||
248 | :- use_module(probltlsrc(ltl_tools),[temporal_parser/3]). | |
249 | :- use_module(probltlsrc(ltl),[ltl_model_check_ast/4]). | |
250 | :- public check_scc_ce/2. | |
251 | check_scc_ce(LtlFormula,SCC) :- | |
252 | Max = 10000, Mode = init, | |
253 | ( temporal_parser(LtlFormula,ltl,Ltl) -> | |
254 | true | |
255 | ; otherwise -> | |
256 | add_error_fail(ltl,'LTL Parser failed: ',LtlFormula)), | |
257 | ltl: ltl_model_check_ast(Ltl,Max,Mode,Status), % TO DO: why do we call this internal predicate ?? | |
258 | clean_scc(Status,Result), | |
259 | atom_codes(SCC,Codes), | |
260 | read_from_codes(Codes,SCCTerm), | |
261 | (match_ce_result(SCCTerm,Result) -> | |
262 | true | |
263 | ; otherwise -> | |
264 | print(result_was(Result)),nl, | |
265 | add_error(ltl_scc_check,'No one of the SCCs could be reproduced as counter example: ',SCC) | |
266 | ). | |
267 | ||
268 | % predicates for removing all unnecessary information like atomids and ap/tp evaluations | |
269 | clean_scc(model(Trace,Entry),Result) :- | |
270 | maplist(get_nodeid,Trace,CleanedTrace), | |
271 | Result = model(CleanedTrace,Entry). | |
272 | ||
273 | get_nodeid(atom(StateId,_Evaluation,_AtomId),StateId). | |
274 | get_nodeid(El,StateId) :- add_internal_error('Unrecognised trace element: ', get_nodeid(El,StateId)). | |
275 | ||
276 | match_ce_result([],_) :- !,fail. | |
277 | match_ce_result([H|T],Result) :- | |
278 | (H = Result -> true; match_ce_result(T,Result)). | |
279 | ||
280 | %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% To get fairness specifications for the particular loop %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% | |
281 | get_fairness_specification(loop(ReEntry),StateTransitions,Assumption) :- !, | |
282 | append_length(Loop,StateTransitions,ReEntry), | |
283 | maplist(get_specifications,Loop,ListsofSpecs), | |
284 | append(ListsofSpecs,Specs), | |
285 | list_to_ord_set(Specs,OrdSet), | |
286 | Assumption = [OrdSet]. | |
287 | get_fairness_specification(_,_,[[]]). | |
288 | ||
289 | get_specifications(strans(StateId,_),Specs) :- | |
290 | findall(Spec, | |
291 | (transition(StateId,Transition,_TransId,_DstId),get_tp_specification(Transition,Spec)), | |
292 | Specs). | |
293 | ||
294 | get_tp_specification(Transition,Spec) :- animation_mode(Mode), | |
295 | get_tp_specification(Mode,Transition,Spec). | |
296 | ||
297 | get_tp_specification(b,Transition,Spec) :- !, | |
298 | get_tp_specification_for_b(Transition,Spec). | |
299 | get_tp_specification(csp_and_b,Transition,Spec) :- !, | |
300 | get_tp_specification_for_csp_and_b(Transition,Spec). | |
301 | get_tp_specification(cspm,Transition,Spec) :- !, | |
302 | get_tp_specification_for_csp(Transition,Spec). | |
303 | get_tp_specification(xtl, Transition,Spec) :- !, % TO DO: review wether ok | |
304 | create_xtl_action_argument(Transition,Spec). | |
305 | get_tp_specification(Mode,Transition,_Spec) :- | |
306 | add_error_fail(ltl_verification, 'Fairness not implemented for formalism yet ',Mode:Transition). | |
307 | ||
308 | /* B transition specification */ | |
309 | get_tp_specification_for_b('-->'(Op,ReturnValues),Spec) :- !, | |
310 | Op =.. [OpName|Args], | |
311 | length(Args,NumberArgs), | |
312 | length(ReturnValues,NumberResults), | |
313 | Spec=bop(OpName,NumberArgs,NumberResults,Args,ReturnValues). | |
314 | get_tp_specification_for_b(Transition,Spec) :- | |
315 | Transition =.. [OpName|Args], | |
316 | length(Args,NumberArgs), | |
317 | Spec=bop(OpName,NumberArgs,0,Args,[]). | |
318 | ||
319 | /* CSP transition specification */ | |
320 | get_tp_specification_for_csp(tick(_),Res) :- !, Res = csp(tick,0,[]). | |
321 | get_tp_specification_for_csp(tau(_),Res) :- !, Res=csp(tau,0,[]). | |
322 | get_tp_specification_for_csp(io(Vals,Channel,_Span),Res) :- !, | |
323 | length(Vals,N), | |
324 | Res = csp(Channel,N,Vals). | |
325 | get_tp_specification_for_csp(A,Action) :- | |
326 | add_internal_error('Unknown CSP event: ',get_tp_specification_for_csp(A,Action)), | |
327 | Action=csp(unknown(A),0,[]). | |
328 | ||
329 | :- use_module(probltlsrc(ltl_propositions),[check_transition/4]). | |
330 | ev_fairness_id(Spec,StateId,Op) :- | |
331 | check_transition(Spec,Op,StateId,_DstId). | |
332 | ev_fairness_id(Spec,StateId,TransId,Op) :- | |
333 | transition(StateId,Op,TransId,DstId), | |
334 | check_transition(Spec,Op,StateId,DstId). |